Ron Paul seeks to unmask YouTube user who uploaded offensive Huntsman ad

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Citizen and the American Civil Liberties Union have told a federal district court that the presidential campaign of Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) should not be able to unmask an anonymous YouTube user [named “NHLiberty4Paul”] who uploaded an offensive video attacking Jon Huntsman…

In a complaint filed January 13, Paul asserted that the use of his name infringed his trademark and defamed him by improperly implying that he was behind it. The campaign has moved to identify the anonymous YouTube user, and seeks to have the video removed from the web and for the user to be prohibited from ever using Paul’s name.

But Public Citizen, the EFF, and the ACLU said in an amicus brief (PDF) that the YouTube user has a First Amendment right to speak anonymously and cannot be subpoenaed unless the complaint produces evidence showing that there is a realistic chance that the lawsuit will be successful. The brief also argued that trademark law does not allow lawsuits over purely noncommercial political speech.

But remember: Ron Paul loves the Constitution! (Except for the part with that pesky First Amendment.)
Ron Paul seeks to unmask YouTube user who uploaded offensive Huntsman ad

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, Public Citizen and the American Civil Liberties Union have told a federal district court that the presidential campaign of Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) should not be able to unmask an anonymous YouTube user [named “NHLiberty4Paul”] who uploaded an offensive video attacking Jon Huntsman…

In a complaint filed January 13, Paul asserted that the use of his name infringed his trademark and defamed him by improperly implying that he was behind it. The campaign has moved to identify the anonymous YouTube user, and seeks to have the video removed from the web and for the user to be prohibited from ever using Paul’s name.

But Public Citizen, the EFF, and the ACLU said in an amicus brief (PDF) that the YouTube user has a First Amendment right to speak anonymously and cannot be subpoenaed unless the complaint produces evidence showing that there is a realistic chance that the lawsuit will be successful. The brief also argued that trademark law does not allow lawsuits over purely noncommercial political speech.

But remember: Ron Paul loves the Constitution! (Except for the part with that pesky First Amendment.)

The overall number of GOP presidential ads on the airwaves this election year is comparable with 2008, but who is paying for them so far has changed significantly. The influence of SuperPACs in the race for the 2012 GOP nomination is clear, with a more than 1600 percent increase in interest-group sponsored ads aired as compared to 2008…

Even though Romney has not been on the airwaves as much as he was in 2008, his campaign and its allies have dominated the airwaves in Florida, airing almost 13,000 ads on broadcast television across the state, as of Wednesday, the 25th…

[The right-wing Koch brothers’] Americans for Prosperity has aired over 5,000 spots in battleground state markets, while [former Bush administration official Karl Rove’s] Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies has aired over 4,200 spots in similar markets. The American Petroleum Institute also aired around 1,500 spots.

(Source: politicalprof, via bethanypost)

Amid a bruising primary campaign, Republicans remain unimpressed with their party’s presidential field. In fact, more Republican and Republican-leaning registered voters say the GOP field is only fair or poor (52%) than did so in early January (44%)…

More than half of all registered voters (55%) say Obama understands the problems of average Americans very or fairly well. About four-in-ten (41%) say he understands people’s problems not too well or not at all well.

Only about four-in-ten voters (39%) give Romney high marks for understanding the problems of average Americans; about the same percentage (36%) says Gingrich does very or fairly well in understanding people’s problems.



GOP Voters Continue to Give Field Subpar Ratings

Axelrod tweaks Romney over strapping dog to car roof

Axelrod tweeted a picture of Obama riding in the presidential limousine with his dog, Bo, and included a veiled swipe at Mitt Romney:

“How loving owners transport their dogs,” Axelrod wrote.

The comment was a reference to a widely-circulated story about how Romney strapped his family dog, Seamus, in a kennel to the roof of his car during a 12-hour road trip to Canada despite the Irish setter suffering from diarrhea. The incident happened in 1983.

Axelrod tweaks Romney over strapping dog to car roof

Axelrod tweeted a picture of Obama riding in the presidential limousine with his dog, Bo, and included a veiled swipe at Mitt Romney:

“How loving owners transport their dogs,” Axelrod wrote.

The comment was a reference to a widely-circulated story about how Romney strapped his family dog, Seamus, in a kennel to the roof of his car during a 12-hour road trip to Canada despite the Irish setter suffering from diarrhea. The incident happened in 1983.

Mitt Romney did not give away 42% of his income to charity, he gave 19.2% of adjusted gross income to charity. Jennifer Rubin is a right-wing propagandist and the Washington Post should fire her for this latest example of her dishonesty.

And another thing: The Obamas gave 14.2% of their income before tax deductions and exemptions to charity. As a commenter points out, “[The Obamas] shouldn’t be giving away [nearly] as big a percentage to charity as Romney,” given that the Obamas make much less money.

This year [the Pentagon is requesting] a reduction from $531 billion to $525 billion, 1.6 percent. You mean our freedom is in trouble because of that 1.6 percent? … How paranoid do you have to be to say that [Obama] is gutting our military?


Bill Maher, humiliating Republican Dana Rohrabacher

Brewer Has History Of Getting Facts Wrong

An internal Newt Gingrich campaign memo obtained by the Daily Caller claims “this race is just getting started.”

The memo stresses that Mitt Romney currently has just 33 of the 1144 delegates needed (Gingrich has 25 of 1144).

In addition, more than 20% of the available delegates (467) will be awarded on Super Tuesday March 6, 2012, and the memo notes that, one of the Super Tuesday states is Georgia, with 76 delegates at stake. To put that in perspective, “even if Romney wins Florida on Tuesday, he will only have 83 total delegates; Newt’s home state could effectively cancel out his entire delegate count to date.”



Gingrich Looks Ahead to Super Tuesday

tpmmedia:

How Mitt Romney’s tax rate stacks up to those of recent candidates for president.

tpmmedia:

How Mitt Romney’s tax rate stacks up to those of recent candidates for president.

If his predecessor cursed Obama by handing him a depression and two wars, the Good Lord has blessed him with the weakest field of opponents in memory. I stand by my early assessment: when I look at the economy, I think Obama can’t win, but when I look at the Republicans, I think he can’t lose. The economy is starting to get better; the Republicans aren’t.


Paul Begala, “The Losers and Lucky Duckies of Campaign 2012.”

*Not an actual quote from Republican congressman Diaper Dave Vitter.

think-progress:

A must-watch video on the GOP’s racial politics

From Newt Gingrich’s lectures on how African-Americans should demand paychecks instead of food stamps, to labeling Obama the “food-stamp president,” betcha didn’t think the GOP’s rhetoric could be this dehumanizing.

Whoever watches and compiles this material must have a cast-iron stomach. I couldn’t view more than sixty seconds of this garbage, or the garbage that garbage was spewing. — Ryking

sarahlee310:

Joe Weisenthal counters James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute