thenewrepublic:

First immigration, now health care: Did the federal government screw up its arguments before the Supreme Court again?
“In fact, however, as he did in the health care case, Verrilli again failed to make the most convincing constitutional argument in support of his position. The argument that the government should have offered in the immigration case closely resembles the one it failed to offer in the health care case. In the immigration case, the argument goes something like this: The Framers of the Constitution intended to transfer power over foreign relations from the individual states to the federal government. The federal government uses its immigration powers—including the power to welcome, expel, detain, and place conditions on aliens—as an instrument of foreign policy. State laws like Arizona’s SB 1070 undermine the uniformity of federal foreign relations policy and can harm relations with foreign countries by inviting retaliation against U.S. citizens abroad.”
- Jeffrey Rosen, First Health Care, Now Immigration: How the Government Fumbled Its Latest Supreme Court Case
Photo courtesy of MSNBC

Is Verrilli just a blithering incompetent or are the Koch brothers holding his wife and daughter hostage to ensure that he throws all of his cases before the Supreme Court? Jesus fucking Christ. — Ryking

thenewrepublic:

First immigration, now health care: Did the federal government screw up its arguments before the Supreme Court again?

“In fact, however, as he did in the health care case, Verrilli again failed to make the most convincing constitutional argument in support of his position. The argument that the government should have offered in the immigration case closely resembles the one it failed to offer in the health care case. In the immigration case, the argument goes something like this: The Framers of the Constitution intended to transfer power over foreign relations from the individual states to the federal government. The federal government uses its immigration powers—including the power to welcome, expel, detain, and place conditions on aliens—as an instrument of foreign policy. State laws like Arizona’s SB 1070 undermine the uniformity of federal foreign relations policy and can harm relations with foreign countries by inviting retaliation against U.S. citizens abroad.”

- Jeffrey Rosen, First Health Care, Now Immigration: How the Government Fumbled Its Latest Supreme Court Case

Photo courtesy of MSNBC

Is Verrilli just a blithering incompetent or are the Koch brothers holding his wife and daughter hostage to ensure that he throws all of his cases before the Supreme Court? Jesus fucking Christ. — Ryking

As with the health care arguments, the exchanges often went past the legal conflict over state and federal authority and into the realm of politics. And here, as ever, the conservative justices on the court showed signs of living in a Fox News cocoon. The facts on the ground—that the federal government has deported more than a million unauthorized immigrants in the past three years and net migration from Mexico has reached zero and possibly even reversed—didn’t seem to matter.


Arizona, Immigration, and the Supreme Court: A Dispatch from Foxnewsistan

Supreme Court review of Arizona immigration law leaves Romney in a bind

For Romney, the court hearing comes just as he is seeking to shift his tone on immigration from a hardline stance on the issue catered to the Republican base to a more moderate position. The issue of immigration — and this law in particular — have put the former governor in a delicate spot, where he could seize on the issue to spotlight the president’s failures but runs the risk of turning off Latino voters, a voting bloc growing in size and and influence. Democrats are waiting for him to make the wrong move, giving them a better chance to turn the Arizona law into a galvanizing force for their party.

Supreme Court review of Arizona immigration law leaves Romney in a bind

For Romney, the court hearing comes just as he is seeking to shift his tone on immigration from a hardline stance on the issue catered to the Republican base to a more moderate position. The issue of immigration — and this law in particular — have put the former governor in a delicate spot, where he could seize on the issue to spotlight the president’s failures but runs the risk of turning off Latino voters, a voting bloc growing in size and and influence. Democrats are waiting for him to make the wrong move, giving them a better chance to turn the Arizona law into a galvanizing force for their party.

Victory on Arizona Immigration Law Could Cost Republicans in the Long Run

If the Supreme Court rejects the Obama administration’s challenge to the Arizona immigration law, the ruling would be widely viewed as a victory for the Republican Party, whose leadership spearheaded the law in the state and championed its spirit nationwide.

But at what cost?

Vindicating Arizona’s crackdown on illegal immigration could embolden other Republican-led states to pass similarly tough laws —  as Georgia, Utah, Indiana, Arizona, and South Carolina have already done – and further the perception that the GOP is hostile to immigrants, and indirectly, to the Hispanic community.

That would put the party on the wrong side of demographics. Hispanics comprise the fastest growing share of the U.S. electorate and wield the power to swing elections in key battleground states, including Colorado, Florida, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Virginia. These states helped put Obama in the White House and will determine the majority party for decades to come.

Victory on Arizona Immigration Law Could Cost Republicans in the Long Run

If the Supreme Court rejects the Obama administration’s challenge to the Arizona immigration law, the ruling would be widely viewed as a victory for the Republican Party, whose leadership spearheaded the law in the state and championed its spirit nationwide.

But at what cost?

Vindicating Arizona’s crackdown on illegal immigration could embolden other Republican-led states to pass similarly tough laws — as Georgia, Utah, Indiana, Arizona, and South Carolina have already done – and further the perception that the GOP is hostile to immigrants, and indirectly, to the Hispanic community.

That would put the party on the wrong side of demographics. Hispanics comprise the fastest growing share of the U.S. electorate and wield the power to swing elections in key battleground states, including Colorado, Florida, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Virginia. These states helped put Obama in the White House and will determine the majority party for decades to come.

Senate GOP Boycotts Hearing On Ariz. Immigration Law

Arizona’s controversial immigration measure has inspired numerous boycotts — and on Tuesday, it provoked another, when Senate Republicans refused to show up at a hearing on the measure. The hearing took place one day before the Supreme Court begins to weigh its constitutionality, leaving Democrats to spar with the author of the measure and paint the GOP as “absent” — literally — on immigration reform…

No. 3 Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer (NY), the party’s leader on messaging, said it was “telling” Republicans were absent. “They can’t defend the law and they don’t want to be tied to it,” he said at the hearing. “They were absent from this hearing just like they’ve been absent from every attempt to negotiate a comprehensive solution to our immigration problem.”

Senate GOP Boycotts Hearing On Ariz. Immigration Law

Arizona’s controversial immigration measure has inspired numerous boycotts — and on Tuesday, it provoked another, when Senate Republicans refused to show up at a hearing on the measure. The hearing took place one day before the Supreme Court begins to weigh its constitutionality, leaving Democrats to spar with the author of the measure and paint the GOP as “absent” — literally — on immigration reform…

No. 3 Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer (NY), the party’s leader on messaging, said it was “telling” Republicans were absent. “They can’t defend the law and they don’t want to be tied to it,” he said at the hearing. “They were absent from this hearing just like they’ve been absent from every attempt to negotiate a comprehensive solution to our immigration problem.”

Senate Democrats are making plans to force a floor vote on legislation that would invalidate Arizona’s controversial immigration statute if the Supreme Court upholds the law this summer.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) will announce the fallback legislation at a hearing on the Arizona law Tuesday, a day before the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in a suit to determine whether Arizona had the authority to enact the 2010 state crackdown.

The legislation would have little chance of passing in a stalemated Senate or being approved by a GOP-held House, but it would allow Democrats to push their electoral advantage with Latino voters just as the presidential campaign heats up in July.

The plan is to allow Democrats a route to express displeasure with the Arizona law if the court allows it to stand, and it would force Republicans to take a clear position on the law during the height of the presidential campaign. The immigration law is deeply unpopular with Latino voters, who could be key to the outcome of the presidential and Senate races in several Western states.



Democrats plan to force vote on Arizona immigration law if it’s upheld by court

In its second-biggest case this term, the court - fresh from hearing the Obama healthcare overhaul case - will consider on Wednesday whether a tough Arizona immigration crackdown strayed too far into the federal government’s powers.

A pro-Arizona decision would be a legal and political setback for Obama, who has criticized the state’s law and vowed to push for immigration legislation if re-elected on November 6.

A decision against Arizona would deal a blow to Romney, who has said the government should drop its challenge to the law.



U.S. Supreme Court immigration case weighs states’ powers

This election was considered a bellwether for Arizona’s 2012 electoral races and represents a huge defeat for the far-right wing of Arizona’s GOP by its socially moderate wing.

@nickmartin: With 87% of the vote in, Jerry Lewis on his way to unseating arguably the most powerful state politician in AZ, Sen. Russell Pearce: 53%-46%

@nickmartin: With 87% of the vote in, Jerry Lewis on his way to unseating arguably the most powerful state politician in AZ, Sen. Russell Pearce: 53%-46%

@nickmartin: Now with 62% of the vote in, challenger Jerry Lewis is still ahead of Sen. Russell Pearce, 53% to 46%.

@nickmartin: Now with 62% of the vote in, challenger Jerry Lewis is still ahead of Sen. Russell Pearce, 53% to 46%.

In the Mesa Legislative District 18 recall election against Arizona Senate President Russell Pearce, it is looking like Mr. Pearce will lose his seat in the Arizona Senate. According to exit polling political newcomer Jerry Lewis is ahead of Mr. Pearce by double digits. These exit polls are unofficial but all indications by the amount of the turn out by Mesa voters in this district it is a strong possiblity that Mr. Lewis will be the next Arizona State Senator for Mesa Legislative District 18…

Just got off phone with Jerry Lewis’ Campaign Manager Anson Clarkson that the exit polls had Jerry Lewis ahead in the 13-14 point range.


Latest exit polling shows Jerry Lewis ahead of Russell Pearce.

Pearce’s defeat would be a huge upset — and put other legislators who supported Pearce and SB 1070 (Arizona’s “Papers Please” law) on notice that Arizonans don’t want to see immigrants turned into scapegoats for the GOP.

Update: “As of 8 p.m., the results from the Maricopa County Recorder’s office indicate Lewis had a 53 percent to 45 percent lead over Pearce, with nearly 14,000 ballots counted.”

sarahlee310:

Fri Oct 21, 2011

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton’s ruling marked a victory for the Obama administration in its legal and political battle against Arizona and Governor Jan Brewer over illegal immigration.

Brewer, a Republican, filed the suit in February as a counter-claim after the Obama administration sued Arizona to overturn the state’s controversial law, SB-1070, cracking down on illegal immigrants.

We are releasing hundreds of private intelligence bulletins, training manuals, personal email correspondence, names, phone numbers, addresses and passwords belonging to Arizona law enforcement. We are targeting AZDPS specifically because we are against SB1070 and the racial profiling anti-immigrant police state that is Arizona.

The documents classified as “law enforcement sensitive”, “not for public distribution”, and “for official use only” are primarily related to border patrol and counter-terrorism operations and describe the use of informants to infiltrate various gangs, cartels, motorcycle clubs, Nazi groups, and protest movements.

Every week we plan on releasing more classified documents and embarassing personal details of military and law enforcement in an effort not just to reveal their racist and corrupt nature but to purposefully sabotage their efforts to terrorize communities fighting an unjust “war on drugs”.



LulzSec: “CHINGA LA MIGRA BULLETIN #1 6/23/2011”